The O’Neill Book
Chapter One: The Story of
John and Esther O’Neill
One
family of O’Neills, at least, and there may have been several, settled just
outside the city of Dublin. They may have constituted a part of that “wild,
barbarian horde” which so offended the finer sensibilities of that proud
English lord [Clarendon].
A decade
after the visit of Lord Clarendon to Dublin [1686], a son was born to a family
of O’Neills near Dublin. Little is known of this Hugh who was born in 1696. We
feel safe in saying that he married and raised a large family; for such was the
custom of the Irish of that day, and more especially so of the O’Neills.
This
Hugh had a son born to him in 1729, and he named the child “John.” We would
guess he was named for his grandfather. This last statement is somewhat
speculative; but to make it seem probable, I wish to notice a peculiarity that
ran through the family for several generations: I have called it the
“HUGH-JOHN” line of O’Neills. This evidently started with the Earl of Tyrone,
whom we think, must have been the original Hugh. For a period of eighty years
we have not record, but in 1696 a Hugh was born. In 1729 a son of Hugh was
named John; in 1773 a son of this John was named Hugh, and at New Town,
Ireland, in 1797, a son was born to this last named Hugh, who was named John.
This John, in turn, had a son Hugh, born in Summerfield, Ohio, in 1830, and
this Hugh had a son named John Henry, for several years a physician at Morgan
City, La. Dr. John H. O’Neill had two sons but no Hugh. It seems almost a pity
that he had not named one of them Hugh.
This
Hugh, born in the year 1696, of unknown parentage, died probably in the home of
his son John, at the remarkable age of 94 years. He died in 1790.
This
John, son of Hugh O’Neill, was born near Dublin, Ireland, in the year
1729. Although descended from the
“Savage Old Irish,” accounted too lazy to work, or from the “Wild Barbarians”
that English history speaks of, yet this John O’Neill was a remarkable man in
many respects. He was a fine type of the Irish gentleman of the Old School, an
ancestor of whom any member of the family may justly feed proud. He was the
original owner of the old Bible that came across the Sea in 1806…From the fact
that he owned a Protestant Bible, at all, is sufficient evidence that he was
not longer a Catholic.
…his
“Confession of Faith”…reads so much like the tenets of the Methodist Church
that he surely must have been a disciple of the celebrated John Wesley. To make
our surmises seen the more probable, we wish to notice that Wesley began
preaching in Dublin in 1746, at which time John O’Neill was seventeen, a very
susceptible age. Many have wondered why this branch of the family are not
Catholics, as most other O’Neills are. The reason is simple: John O’Neill renounced
Catholicism and joined the Methodist Church under the preaching of the Wesleys.
Now the
third and last inference we wish to make touching the old Bible is this: Its
owner was a man of some educational advantages; otherwise he would never have
cared to own a Bible. A book of any sort would be worth but little to a man
that could not read. From the records and other writings we discern the touch
of the hand of a scholar. It is depicted in his diction, and correct
orthography, and in his specimens of penmanship that adorn almost every
available space on the blank pages of that sacred old book.
This John was united in marriage
with Esther Ashmore on the second day of June, 1754.
I contacted Dr. Raymond Refausse of
the Church of Ireland Church Body Library in Dublin and he stated that no
parish registers for Old Leighlin exist prior to 1791, so we may never be able
to verify this marriage.
To this union ten children were
born, as follows—
Hugh 1A
James 1B
Catherine 1C
John 1D
John(2nd) 1E
Morgan 1F
Luke 1G
Hugh(2nd) 1H
George 1I
William 1J
[Code
letters following names are my additions.]
Of the
seven living sons of John and Esther, but little is known, except of HUGH, who
is in the ancestral line leading to our own branch of the family. This Hugh
received an education that might have been considered liberal for Ireland at
that time.
Had we
the time and the ability and the data sufficient to trace the genealogy of the
other six sons, it would not be prudent, for it would be of but little interest
to the descendents of John and Anne O’Neill here in America.
Esther,
wife of this John, died in December, 1803, after a married life of forty-nine
years and six months. A few days after the death of Esther, Grandmother Ashmore,
Esther’s mother, died, having reached the age of ninety years. In November of
the year 1804, John died also, aged seventy-five years.
The above
passage by G. W. O’Neill in 1937 makes many statements about the early Irish
O’Neill line, but nowhere can we find the documentation that G.W. used to
create this book.
Hugh and
Deborah O’Neill must have left Ireland immediately after the death of his
father John, and that event may have precipitated their immigration.
No comments:
Post a Comment